Supreme Court Allows State to Dissolve Redevelopment Agencies, Seize $1.7 Billion

The California Supreme Court deemed the state’s seizure of $1.7 billion in redevelopment money is legal.

The California Supreme Court today upheld a law that dissolves the state's 400 redevelopment agencies and allows the state to seize $1.7 billion in property tax revenue to fund schools and special districts.

But the court struck down a second law that would have enabled the agencies to come back into existence if they agreed to contribute $400 million annually in future years to schools, transit and firefighting programs.

The by .

The panel said the second measure violated a 2010 voter initiative that barred the state from diverting property tax revenues from redevelopment agencies.

Justice Kathryn Werdegar wrote that the Legislature had the power to terminate the agencies, but did not have the authority to require mandatory payments as a condition of future existence.

Both laws were enacted by the Legislature and signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in June as steps to help close the state's $25 billion budget deficit.

The state high court issued its ruling in San Francisco in a lawsuit filed by the California Redevelopment Association, League of California Cities and the cities of San Jose and Union City.

While the ruling is good news for Brown and his camp of lawmakers, it may have detrimental effects on cities who used redevelopment funds for key development projects.

Many local projects, including the "Ashland Youth Center, Castro Valley Library, and many streetscape and sidewalk improvements" were made possible through the support of the Alameda County Redevelopment Agency .

Dissolving the local agency would greatly impact several projects in the works in the Eden Area including a firehouse and a community center in Cherryland; a streetscaping project along East 14th Street in Ashland; the long planned development of the Bohannon properties in downtown San Lorenzo; the Meekland Avenue Master Plan.

Bay City News contributed to this report.

David Ross December 30, 2011 at 02:18 AM
This is what happens when voters keep reelecting he same idiots to the state legislature. It's also what happens when you elect a governor who shouldn't be there to begin with. There's a term limit on governors. Yes, I know the law was enacted after moonbeam left office but he should have followed the spirit of the law, as should have the voters who voted for him. Now, does this mean we can look forward to the ill-conceived "beautification" of Castro Valley Boulevard?
Thomas Clarke December 30, 2011 at 05:42 PM
David, the way I read this if the funds were already committed and the County opted in then those funds for forward, so yes the Castro Valley Boulevard will continue.
Analisa Harangozo December 30, 2011 at 05:54 PM
David, Yes, the CV Boulevard beautification will continue on.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »