.
Feedback

Update: Home Destroyed, Two Damaged in Overnight Fire

No injuries were reported but six residents were displaced. Alameda County Fire Department is working with the Sheriff's Office to determine how many people were displaced.

Updated 7:30 a.m. Saturday:

By Bay City News

Six residents were displaced by a two-alarm fire that destroyed a home in unincorporated San Leandro Friday night and damaged two others, an Alameda County fire spokeswoman said.

Firefighters responded to the fire at 2135 Pico Place at around 9 p.m. and found smoke and flames coming from the sides of the two-story residence.

The smoke and flames could be seen for miles, fire spokeswoman Aisha Knowles said.

Firefighters struggled to prevent the fire from spreading to neighboring homes, and it took 45 minutes to contain the blaze and another 27 minutes to extinguish it, Knowles said.

The house was destroyed in the fire, and the exteriors of the two surrounding houses were damaged.

The six residents had evacuated the home before firefighters arrived, and no one was injured.

Two cats and one dog remain missing this morning, Knowles said.

A total of 36 firefighters, three trucks and five engines responded to the scene, and two crews of reserve firefighters stayed behind to keep watch over the debris throughout the night.

The cause of the fire is under investigation.

The Alameda County Fire Department is working with the Alameda County Sheriff's Office to determine how many people were displaced, she said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Castro Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
David Ross May 19, 2013 at 09:47 am
Another problem: When notified of a reply to a comment I could click the link in the email to go toRead More the article. That was not possible this time. So because a small minority zooms there computer the layout should be as it is? I don't think so. All that white space means that an article that could be read with just one or two clicks to scroll through is now going to take more scrolling to view. One thing that seems to be missing in today's world are web designers who (1) change the layout just because and (2) web designers who have neglected to consider the audience. The more I look at this layout the less I like it. The font needs to be darker than it is. the blue (like in "announcements") needs to be bolder. Overall, on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 best), I rank the new "improved" design a 3.
anthony May 19, 2013 at 08:21 am
was on my father's laptop and he zooms his screen to 125...didn't need to keep bumping the pageRead More right and left, kinda liked it then.
David Ross May 19, 2013 at 08:05 am
Why does the new layout waste nearly half of the screen? There's a wide white space on the left andRead More even wider white space on the right. While the old layout could have been tweaked some, the new format isn't the answer. One good thing. I no longer have to sign in each time I want to make a comment. It has finally decided that I'm serious when I say I want Patch to remember me on this computer.
Joyce Tavares May 17, 2013 at 02:10 pm
She is home safe! Was at clinic for about 24 hours....thanks so much to the Boulevard PetRead More Hospital!! You just may have saved a life..... :0)
MICHELLE CLOWSER May 19, 2013 at 10:56 am
This was very successful. Thank you to the 32 families that participated and to Papa Panchos forRead More their generous donations, even above the percentage they promised. It made for a very busy night.